Welcome to the second edition of the Marketing with Intent newsletter, by Resultful.
In this edition, we’re going to be deep diving into the importance of having an effective marketing strategy in place and how marketing can (and should) support overarching business objectives.
Let me know what you think – and, as always, if you need any help, or just want to chew through some ideas over a 15-minute chat (with no obligation), don’t hesitate to get in touch.
Director & Founder, Resultful
I’ve had the privilege to work with somewhere close to 200 channel partners over the past couple of years. It gives you a very unique perspective on where challenges and opportunities lie.
If this experience and exposure has taught me one thing, it’s that the partners investing in marketing are the ones growing quickest. And by investment, that covers off both in resource as well as strategy.
Having an effective (effective being the key word here) marketing strategy in place gives you a clear route to success. When you connect business goals, resource and budget availability and target audiences in a strategic way, you can create a clear roadmap on how you get from A to B. Which, for me, is exactly what a strategy serves to do.
A strategy acts as a top-level blueprint. It should – at a strategic level – explain what you’re trying to do and how you get there. Think about it as a 12-month roadmap: how do we get from where we are today to where we want to be in a years time?
A plan, on the other hand, is much more tactical, detailing what you’re going to do and when.
It’s important that you have both because without the other, they’re less effective. Naturally, you should start with the strategic piece – linking back to business objectives (we’ve hammered this point hard by now), with the plan linking back to the strategy. How do we use the next 4/8/12 weeks to chip away at our overarching goals? And how do we ensure that, by the end of it, we’ve made good progress?
This is by no means a detailed overview of what you need to be thinking about, but this structure will keep you on the right lines:
CPA? CPL? What are you on about?
"CPA" is short for "Cost per acquisition" - the total cost to your business to acquire a new customer. Typically, this covers off paid ad costs (and is a term often used in this space), but if you wanted to drill down deeper, you could factor in the cost of email platforms, and so on. It's common to have a CPA per channel. By approaching it this way, you actually find out which channels are more cost-effective.
"CPL" stands for "Cost per lead", a level above CPA. Remember, you might need 4 or more leads.to acquire a customer (assuming your customer conversion rate is 1 in 4, for example).
Your CPL would typically be lower than your CPA.
Partners are almost always technically excellent, but lack the time, effort, desire or experience to support their customers with training and adoption, which are arguably as (if not more) important than the implementation itself.
That’s where Illuminate Learning come in. Experts in training and adoption – from supporting teams to sell Microsoft solutions via training and sales enablement, to helping you ensure your customers drive value out of their investments early on. A prime example? Copilot. The Illuminate Learning team are at the top of their game when it comes to understanding, selling and adopting Copilot. So, if you’re looking for a partner to help you level up what you’re doing in that space, check them out.
Follow them on LinkedIn here.
We’re Resultful, a Microsoft-focused marketing agency. We’re passionate about three core areas